Sometimes it takes some troubleshooting and utilization of different methods available to ensure an Axiom that you’re working on executes correctly from a specific step in the middle of the one that you’re working on.
It would be super helpful to have the capability to trigger the Axiom to begin running from a specific step anywhere in the list of steps, and establish and end step in the Axiom where you want it to stop. This would eliminate the need for making changes, running an axiom from the beginning each time, and crossing your fingers hoping that it works).
The big idea is that Axioms work by piecing together several small steps in order to accomplish a bigger task. This capability would allow users to confidently test each step with variable inputs encountered and minimize the potential for the Axiom to fail and send the creator back to the drawing board.
I’m sorry if this is super long, but I think this is a crucial step needed to help users building trust, and depend more on their Axioms to succesfully comple a task that can be consistently relied on in profressional settings where there isn’t much tolerance for systems to not perform as expected.